6-52024890-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_138694.4(PKHD1):c.4920A>G(p.Val1640=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.005 in 1,614,222 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V1640V) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_138694.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKHD1 | NM_138694.4 | c.4920A>G | p.Val1640= | synonymous_variant | 32/67 | ENST00000371117.8 | NP_619639.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKHD1 | ENST00000371117.8 | c.4920A>G | p.Val1640= | synonymous_variant | 32/67 | 1 | NM_138694.4 | ENSP00000360158 | P2 | |
PKHD1 | ENST00000340994.4 | c.4920A>G | p.Val1640= | synonymous_variant | 32/61 | 5 | ENSP00000341097 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00283 AC: 431AN: 152224Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00226 AC: 569AN: 251352Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00219 AC XY: 297AN XY: 135834
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00523 AC: 7639AN: 1461880Hom.: 30 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00511 AC XY: 3715AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00283 AC: 431AN: 152342Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00248 AC XY: 185AN XY: 74510
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | PKHD1: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 09, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12846734) - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 02, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 06, 2020 | - - |
Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 11, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Polycystic kidney disease Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PKHD1 p.Val1640= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the GeneInsight-COGR, LOVD 3.0, databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs142465959) as “NA” and ClinVar (benign by Invitae and likely benign by Emory Genetics and Prevention Genetics). The RWTH AAachen University ARPKD database identified a different nucleotide change at the same position, c.4920A>C with the same protein consequence p.Val1640= as a polymorphism. The variant was identified in control databases in 619 of 277084 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.002234, seen in the following populations: European (Non-Finnish) in 521 of 126590 chromosomes (freq. 0.004116), Other in 13 of 6464 chromosomes (freq. 0.002011), Latino in 51 of 34416 chromosomes (freq. 0.001482), African in 21 of 24028 chromosomes (freq. 0.000874), Ashkenazi Jewish in 2 of 10142 chromosomes (freq. 0.0001972), South Asian in 6 of 30782 chromosomes (freq. 0.0001949), and European (Finnish) in 5 of 25792 chromosomes (freq. 0.0001939), but was not seen in the East Asian population, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Val1640= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at