6-63720617-A-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 4P and 4B. PM1PM2BP4_Strong

The NM_001142800.2(EYS):c.9414T>G(p.Asp3138Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000696 in 1,493,528 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000070 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

EYS
NM_001142800.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.02

Variant links:

Genes affected

EYS (HGNC:21555): (eyes shut homolog) The product of this gene contains multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like and LamG domains. The protein is expressed in the photoreceptor layer of the retina, and the gene is mutated in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

EYS links:

PHF3 (HGNC:8921): (PHD finger protein 3) This gene encodes a member of a PHD finger-containing gene family. This gene may function as a transcription factor and may be involved in glioblastomas development. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2014]

PHF3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM1

In a domain Laminin G-like 5 (size 190) in uniprot entity EYS_HUMAN there are 14 pathogenic changes around while only 2 benign (88%) in NM_001142800.2

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013729215).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EYS	NM_001142800.2 link	c.9414T>G	p.Asp3138Glu	missense_variant	Exon 43 of 43	ENST00000503581.6	NP_001136272.1	Q5T1H1-1
PHF3	NM_001370348.2 link	c.*6909A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 16 of 16	ENST00000262043.8	NP_001357277.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EYS	ENST00000503581.6 link	c.9414T>G	p.Asp3138Glu	missense_variant	Exon 43 of 43	5	NM_001142800.2	ENSP00000424243.1	Q5T1H1-1
EYS	ENST00000370621.7 link	c.9477T>G	p.Asp3159Glu	missense_variant	Exon 44 of 44	1		ENSP00000359655.3	Q5T1H1-3
PHF3	ENST00000262043.8 link	c.*6909A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 16 of 16	5	NM_001370348.2	ENSP00000262043.4	Q92576-1
PHF3	ENST00000505138.1 link	c.361+9255A>C		intron_variant	Intron 3 of 4	3		ENSP00000421417.1	H0Y8L0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000657

AC:

AN:

152140

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000218

AC:

AN:

114426

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000238

AC XY:

AN XY:

58778

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000500

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000701

AC:

AN:

1341268

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000746

AC XY:

AN XY:

657218

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000341

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00153

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000499

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000720

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000657

AC:

AN:

152260

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000672

AC XY:

AN XY:

74454

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.000121

ExAC

AF:

0.0000831

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3476

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Dec 16, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 3138 of the EYS protein (p.Asp3138Glu). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with retinitis pigmentosa (PMID: 29641573). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 964717). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed for this missense variant. However, the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on EYS protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Retinitis pigmentosa 25

Uncertain:1

Aug 05, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Retinal dystrophy

Uncertain:1

Oct 01, 2023

Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.21

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.39

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.042

.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.017

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.040

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Benign

0.44

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.060

MetaRNN

Benign

0.014

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.58

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.2

.;L

PrimateAI

Benign

0.32

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.88

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.24

Sift

Uncertain

0.0030

D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.038

D;D

Polyphen

0.58

P;P

Vest4

0.30

MutPred

0.41

.;Gain of catalytic residue at D3159 (P = 0.087);

MVP

0.49

MPC

0.010

ClinPred

0.11

GERP RS

3.3

Varity_R

0.14

gMVP

0.16

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over