6-64307042-A-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001142800.2(EYS):c.6119T>A(p.Val2040Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00117 in 1,542,280 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

EYS
NM_001142800.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:3B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.49

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

EYS (HGNC:21555): (eyes shut homolog) The product of this gene contains multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like and LamG domains. The protein is expressed in the photoreceptor layer of the retina, and the gene is mutated in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

EYS Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

EYS-related retinopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
retinitis pigmentosa
Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
retinitis pigmentosa 25
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine

EYS links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009310007).

BP6

Variant 6-64307042-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-64307042-A-T is described in CliVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. Clinvar id is 137257. Variant chr6-64307042-A-T is described in CliVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. Clinvar id is 137257. Variant chr6-64307042-A-T is described in CliVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. Clinvar id is 137257. Variant chr6-64307042-A-T is described in CliVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. Clinvar id is 137257.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.00112 (1556/1390320) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.0277 (156/5624). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0242. There are 12 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 793 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 27. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 12 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
EYS	NM_001142800.2 link	c.6119T>A	p.Val2040Asp	missense_variant	Exon 30 of 43	ENST00000503581.6	NP_001136272.1	Q5T1H1-1
EYS	NM_001292009.2 link	c.6119T>A	p.Val2040Asp	missense_variant	Exon 30 of 44		NP_001278938.1	Q5T1H1-3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
EYS	ENST00000503581.6 link	c.6119T>A	p.Val2040Asp	missense_variant	Exon 30 of 43	5	NM_001142800.2	ENSP00000424243.1		Q5T1H1-1
EYS	ENST00000370621.7 link	c.6119T>A	p.Val2040Asp	missense_variant	Exon 30 of 44	1		ENSP00000359655.3		Q5T1H1-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00170

AC:

258

AN:

151842

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000508

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00549

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00683

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00605

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000624

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0348

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00112

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00817

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00171

AC:

262

AN:

152886

AF XY:

0.00167

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000254

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00377

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00542

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00113

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00536

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00112

AC:

1556

AN:

1390320

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00116

AC XY:

793

AN XY:

686318

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000797

AC:

AN:

31370

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00346

AC:

123

AN:

35596

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00510

AC:

128

AN:

25088

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35570

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00125

AC:

AN:

78954

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000205

AC:

AN:

48896

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0277

AC:

156

AN:

5624

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000810

AC:

868

AN:

1071530

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00270

AC:

156

AN:

57692

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.461

Heterozygous variant carriers

133

199

266

332

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

150

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00168

AC:

256

AN:

151960

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00194

AC XY:

144

AN XY:

74276

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000506

AC:

AN:

41462

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00682

AC:

104

AN:

15254

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00605

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5154

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000624

AC:

AN:

4804

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10580

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0306

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00112

AC:

AN:

67928

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00808

AC:

AN:

2104

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00192

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00232

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00180

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000867

AC:

AN:

3474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:3Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

May 05, 2025

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: EYS c.6119T>A (p.Val2040Asp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the first laminin G repeat domain (IPR001791) of the encoded protein sequence. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0017 in 152886 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0038 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.11 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in EYS causing Retinitis Pigmentosa phenotype (0.0034). c.6119T>A has been observed in individual(s) affected with Retinitis Pigmentosa (Audo_2010, Barragan_2010, Sharon_2020, Dinero_2020). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Retinitis Pigmentosa. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 20333770, 21069908, 32483926, 31456290, 26593283). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 137257). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Jun 17, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 16, 2011

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Retinitis pigmentosa

Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1

Jun 23, 2019

Sharon lab, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center

Significance:Likely pathogenic

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:research

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Retinitis pigmentosa 25

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Oct 11, 2019

Baylor Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

May 18, 2021

Pars Genome Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

EYS: BP4 -

Retinal dystrophy

Uncertain:1

Jan 01, 2023

Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.73

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.33

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.24

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.042

.;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.27

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.32

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.91

LIST_S2

Benign

0.59

T;T

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.11

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0093

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.90

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.34

N;N

PhyloP100

5.5

PrimateAI

Benign

0.40

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.91

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.30

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

D;T

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D

Vest4

0.42

MVP

0.66

MPC

0.058

ClinPred

0.036

GERP RS

5.1

Varity_R

0.38

gMVP

0.17

Mutation Taster

=82/18

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over