6-7542072-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_004415.4(DSP):c.157T>G(p.Ser53Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000166 in 1,563,982 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S53P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004415.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004415.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSP | NM_004415.4 | MANE Select | c.157T>G | p.Ser53Ala | missense | Exon 1 of 24 | NP_004406.2 | ||
| DSP | NM_001319034.2 | c.157T>G | p.Ser53Ala | missense | Exon 1 of 24 | NP_001305963.1 | |||
| DSP | NM_001008844.3 | c.157T>G | p.Ser53Ala | missense | Exon 1 of 24 | NP_001008844.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSP | ENST00000379802.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.157T>G | p.Ser53Ala | missense | Exon 1 of 24 | ENSP00000369129.3 | ||
| DSP | ENST00000418664.3 | TSL:1 | c.157T>G | p.Ser53Ala | missense | Exon 1 of 24 | ENSP00000396591.2 | ||
| DSP | ENST00000710359.2 | c.157T>G | p.Ser53Ala | missense | Exon 1 of 24 | ENSP00000518230.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152120Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00117 AC: 192AN: 163682 AF XY: 0.000913 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000162 AC: 228AN: 1411744Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000138 AC XY: 96AN XY: 697600 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74460 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
The Ser53Ala variant in DSP has not been reported in the literature nor previous ly identified by our laboratory. Computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties, conservation, AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. Additional information is neede d to fully assess the clinical significance of the Ser53Ala variant.
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 8;C1854063:Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with wooly hair and keratoderma Benign:1
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
not provided Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
DSP-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at