6-75886931-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1
The NM_004999.4(MYO6):c.2595C>T(p.Pro865Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000193 in 1,613,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004999.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- progressive sensorineural hearing loss-hypertrophic cardiomyopathy syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO6 | NM_004999.4 | c.2595C>T | p.Pro865Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 25 of 35 | ENST00000369977.8 | NP_004990.3 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO6 | ENST00000369977.8 | c.2595C>T | p.Pro865Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 25 of 35 | 1 | NM_004999.4 | ENSP00000358994.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000915 AC: 139AN: 151890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000211 AC: 53AN: 251318 AF XY: 0.000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000118 AC: 172AN: 1461438Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000922 AC XY: 67AN XY: 727040 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000914 AC: 139AN: 152008Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000875 AC XY: 65AN XY: 74314 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
not specified Benign:1
Pro865Pro in Exon 25 of MYO6: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.3% (10/3738) of Afri can American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing P roject (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs150876010). -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at