6-75914153-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PP3_Moderate
The NM_004999.4(MYO6):c.3530G>T(p.Arg1177Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000616 in 1,461,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1177C) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004999.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- progressive sensorineural hearing loss-hypertrophic cardiomyopathy syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000616 AC: 9AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at