6-75914186-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_004999.4(MYO6):āc.3563A>Gā(p.Lys1188Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000481 in 1,614,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0025 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00027 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
MYO6
NM_004999.4 missense
NM_004999.4 missense
Scores
1
6
9
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.07
Genes affected
MYO6 (HGNC:7605): (myosin VI) This gene encodes a reverse-direction motor protein that moves toward the minus end of actin filaments and plays a role in intracellular vesicle and organelle transport. The protein consists of a motor domain containing an ATP- and an actin-binding site and a globular tail which interacts with other proteins. This protein maintains the structural integrity of inner ear hair cells and mutations in this gene cause non-syndromic autosomal dominant and recessive hearing loss. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008768827).
BP6
Variant 6-75914186-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-75914186-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 45158.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=5}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00246 (374/152302) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00859 (357/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00785. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 175 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO6 | NM_004999.4 | c.3563A>G | p.Lys1188Arg | missense_variant | 34/35 | ENST00000369977.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO6 | ENST00000369977.8 | c.3563A>G | p.Lys1188Arg | missense_variant | 34/35 | 1 | NM_004999.4 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00245 AC: 373AN: 152184Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
373
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000652 AC: 164AN: 251470Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000508 AC XY: 69AN XY: 135908
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
164
AN:
251470
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
69
AN XY:
135908
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000275 AC: 402AN: 1461890Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000238 AC XY: 173AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
402
AN:
1461890
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
173
AN XY:
727246
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00246 AC: 374AN: 152302Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00235 AC XY: 175AN XY: 74470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
374
AN:
152302
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
175
AN XY:
74470
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
46
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
86
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 30, 2012 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 26, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 18, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 06, 2020 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 37 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;.;D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
.;N;N;.;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
.;T;T;.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0080, 0.70
.;B;P;B;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at