6-87155673-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_015021.3(ZNF292):c.82C>T(p.Arg28Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000697 in 1,434,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015021.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- complex neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
- intellectual developmental disorder, autosomal dominant 64Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZNF292 | NM_015021.3 | c.82C>T | p.Arg28Trp | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 8 | ENST00000369577.8 | NP_055836.1 | |
ZNF292 | NM_001351444.2 | c.-484C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 9 | NP_001338373.1 | |||
ZNF292 | XM_047418459.1 | c.-652C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 10 | XP_047274415.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.97e-7 AC: 1AN: 1434910Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000141 AC XY: 1AN XY: 711304 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Variants in candidate genes are classified as variants of uncertain significance in accordance with ACMG guidelines (Richards et al., 2015) -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at