7-100463509-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_001004323.3(SPACDR):c.241G>C(p.Val81Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000979 in 1,613,946 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Uncertain significance in ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001004323.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001004323.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPACDR | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.241G>C | p.Val81Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000327732.3 | Q8IZ16 | ||
| SPACDR | TSL:2 | c.364G>C | p.Val122Leu | missense | Exon 1 of 2 | ENSP00000412290.1 | H7C3K1 | ||
| ENSG00000310577 | n.687G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 5 of 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152182Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000213 AC: 53AN: 249172 AF XY: 0.000237 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000937 AC: 137AN: 1461646Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000118 AC XY: 86AN XY: 727098 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152300Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74464 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at