7-100631010-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_003227.4(TFR2):c.1149C>G(p.Ser383Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000656 in 1,371,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S383S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003227.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hemochromatosis type 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFR2 | NM_003227.4 | c.1149C>G | p.Ser383Arg | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 18 | ENST00000223051.8 | NP_003218.2 | |
TFR2 | NM_001206855.3 | c.636C>G | p.Ser212Arg | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 15 | NP_001193784.1 | ||
LOC124901709 | XR_007060454.1 | n.434-146G>C | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000325 AC: 4AN: 123224 AF XY: 0.0000155 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000656 AC: 9AN: 1371664Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000742 AC XY: 5AN XY: 673774 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74304
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at