7-105567208-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_021930.6(RINT1):c.2276C>T(p.Pro759Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00748 in 1,613,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 59 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P759S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0052 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0077 ( 56 hom. )

Consequence

RINT1
NM_021930.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.69

Publications

7 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RINT1 (HGNC:21876): (RAD50 interactor 1) This gene encodes a protein first identified for its ability to interact with the RAD50 double strand break repair protein, with the resulting interaction implicated in the regulation of cell cycle progression and telomere length. The encoded protein may also play a role in trafficking of cellular cargo from the endosome to the trans-Golgi network. Mutations in this gene may be associated with breast cancer in human patients. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2016]

RINT1 links:

EFCAB10 (HGNC:34531): (EF-hand calcium binding domain 10) Predicted to enable calcium ion binding activity. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

EFCAB10 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006407976).

BP6

Variant 7-105567208-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-105567208-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 224921.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00524 (798/152330) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00848 (577/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00791. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 352 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RINT1	NM_021930.6 link	c.2276C>T	p.Pro759Leu	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 15	ENST00000257700.7	NP_068749.3	Q6NUQ1
EFCAB10	NM_001355526.2 link	c.383+259G>A		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 4	ENST00000480514.6	NP_001342455.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RINT1	ENST00000257700.7 link	c.2276C>T	p.Pro759Leu	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 15	1	NM_021930.6	ENSP00000257700.2		Q6NUQ1
EFCAB10	ENST00000480514.6 link	c.383+259G>A		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 4	1	NM_001355526.2	ENSP00000418678.1		A6NFE3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00525

AC:

799

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00157

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00308

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0167

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00476

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00848

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00545

AC:

1366

AN:

250478

AF XY:

0.00539

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00129

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0148

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00273

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00786

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00671

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00772

AC:

11276

AN:

1460868

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00762

AC XY:

5540

AN XY:

726698

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00164

AC:

AN:

33450

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00209

AC:

AN:

44466

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0181

AC:

472

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39674

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00463

AC:

398

AN:

85926

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00275

AC:

147

AN:

53406

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

5762

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00863

AC:

9594

AN:

1111690

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00845

AC:

510

AN:

60368

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.489

Heterozygous variant carriers

569

1138

1708

2277

2846

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

364

728

1092

1456

1820

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00524

AC:

798

AN:

152330

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00472

AC XY:

352

AN XY:

74500

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00156

AC:

AN:

41582

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00307

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0167

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00455

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00179

AC:

AN:

10608

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00848

AC:

577

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

112

149

186

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00788

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00482

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00728

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.0104

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00159

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00942

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00546

AC:

663

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00736

EpiControl

AF:

0.00705

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Jul 02, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The RINT1 p.Pro418Leu variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs34310648), ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae), and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 1493 of 267350 chromosomes (4 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.005584 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1, non-cancer). The variant was observed in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 149 of 9852 chromosomes (freq: 0.01512), European (non-Finnish) in 995 of 117934 chromosomes (freq: 0.008437), Other in 50 of 6678 chromosomes (freq: 0.007487), South Asian in 133 of 30174 chromosomes (freq: 0.004408), European (Finnish) in 64 of 25096 chromosomes (freq: 0.00255), Latino in 69 of 34774 chromosomes (freq: 0.001984) and African in 33 of 23618 chromosomes (freq: 0.001397), but was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Pro418 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

EFCAB10: BS2; RINT1: BP4, BS2 -

RINT1-related disorder

Benign:1

Apr 01, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.080

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.52

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.50

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.14

Eigen

Benign

-0.33

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.14

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.47

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.88

M_CAP

Benign

0.0092

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0064

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.7

PhyloP100

2.7

PrimateAI

Benign

0.28

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.1

REVEL

Benign

0.052

Sift

Benign

0.030

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.032

Polyphen

0.015

Vest4

0.20

MVP

0.43

MPC

0.20

ClinPred

0.016

GERP RS

5.1

Varity_R

0.098

gMVP

0.30

Mutation Taster

=94/6

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over