7-111122864-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_001099658.2(LRRN3):c.92G>A(p.Arg31Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00254 in 1,613,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 129 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R31W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001099658.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRRN3 | NM_001099658.2 | c.92G>A | p.Arg31Gln | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000308478.10 | |
IMMP2L | NM_032549.4 | c.240-159299C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000405709.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRRN3 | ENST00000308478.10 | c.92G>A | p.Arg31Gln | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_001099658.2 | P1 | |
IMMP2L | ENST00000405709.7 | c.240-159299C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_032549.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00428 AC: 651AN: 152092Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00945 AC: 2372AN: 251048Hom.: 87 AF XY: 0.00700 AC XY: 950AN XY: 135668
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00235 AC: 3442AN: 1461666Hom.: 106 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00200 AC XY: 1457AN XY: 727148
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00428 AC: 652AN: 152210Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00511 AC XY: 380AN XY: 74400
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 07, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at