7-115956763-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_012252.4(TFEC):c.298G>A(p.Gly100Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00287 in 1,596,094 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 100 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012252.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFEC | NM_012252.4 | c.298G>A | p.Gly100Ser | missense_variant | 4/8 | ENST00000265440.12 | NP_036384.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFEC | ENST00000265440.12 | c.298G>A | p.Gly100Ser | missense_variant | 4/8 | 1 | NM_012252.4 | ENSP00000265440.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0152 AC: 2314AN: 151780Hom.: 56 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00396 AC: 969AN: 244600Hom.: 21 AF XY: 0.00280 AC XY: 371AN XY: 132286
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00157 AC: 2269AN: 1444196Hom.: 44 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00134 AC XY: 960AN XY: 718216
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0152 AC: 2314AN: 151898Hom.: 56 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0147 AC XY: 1093AN XY: 74238
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 28, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at