7-116699551-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_000245.4(MET):c.467C>T(p.Ser156Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000229 in 1,613,974 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S156S) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000245.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET | NM_000245.4 | c.467C>T | p.Ser156Leu | missense_variant | 2/21 | ENST00000397752.8 | NP_000236.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET | ENST00000397752.8 | c.467C>T | p.Ser156Leu | missense_variant | 2/21 | 1 | NM_000245.4 | ENSP00000380860.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000598 AC: 91AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000218 AC: 54AN: 248200Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000201 AC XY: 27AN XY: 134660
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000190 AC: 278AN: 1461708Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000201 AC XY: 146AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000598 AC: 91AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000591 AC XY: 44AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 21, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Mar 18, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 16, 2024 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast cancer in published literature (PMID: 35264596); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29084058, 34513100, 29212164, 36431263, 35264596, 37835473) - |
MET-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 21, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jan 23, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at