Menu
GeneBe

7-116755424-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1

The NM_000245.4(MET):c.1771C>T(p.Arg591Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000291 in 1,613,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R591Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00015 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MET
NM_000245.4 missense

Scores

10
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.77
Variant links:
Genes affected
MET (HGNC:7029): (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins and the product of the proto-oncogene MET. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that are linked via disulfide bonds to form the mature receptor. Further processing of the beta subunit results in the formation of the M10 peptide, which has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, induces dimerization and activation of the receptor, which plays a role in cellular survival, embryogenesis, and cellular migration and invasion. Mutations in this gene are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and various head and neck cancers. Amplification and overexpression of this gene are also associated with multiple human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.19521517).
BP6
Variant 7-116755424-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-116755424-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134654.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=6, Likely_benign=2, not_provided=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000151 (23/152066) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000482 (20/41476). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000319. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 6 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
METNM_000245.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1771C>T p.Arg591Trp missense_variant 6/21 ENST00000397752.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
METENST00000397752.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1771C>T p.Arg591Trp missense_variant 6/211 NM_000245.4 P3P08581-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
151948
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000435
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000361
AC:
9
AN:
249354
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000296
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135272
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000452
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000111
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000164
AC:
24
AN:
1461806
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000138
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
727196
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000151
AC:
23
AN:
152066
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000807
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74312
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000763
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000151
ExAC
AF:
0.0000745
AC:
9
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 04, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 21, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Identified in healthy individuals undergoing whole genome sequencing and in individual(s) with breast cancer (Bodian et al., 2014; Guindalini et al., 2022); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 35264596, 33255238) -
Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalSep 08, 2023The MET c.1771C>T (p.Arg591Trp)? missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.037% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL is inconclusive about a pathogenic or benign effect of this variant on protein function, and to our knowledge functional studies have not been performed. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance.?? -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingVantari GeneticsFeb 04, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 07, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
MET-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 03, 2023The MET c.1771C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg591Trp. This variant was reported in an individual with breast cancer (Table S3, Guindalini et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35264596) and in an individual with non-small cell lung cancer (Table S2, Zheng et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 33255238). However, it has also been reported in a cohort healthy individuals (Table S1, Bodian et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 24728327). This variant is reported in 0.037% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD and has conflicting interpretations in ClinVar of likely benign and uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/134654/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.25
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.27
Cadd
Pathogenic
26
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.61
D;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.38
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.31
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.75
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.12
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.20
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.32
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
M;M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
0.78
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.7
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.42
Sift
Uncertain
0.020
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.026
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;.
Vest4
0.38
MVP
0.36
MPC
0.87
ClinPred
0.34
T
GERP RS
1.9
Varity_R
0.34
gMVP
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs45602940; hg19: chr7-116395478; COSMIC: COSV59260108; COSMIC: COSV59260108; API