7-117559587-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 5P and 2B. PM1PM5PP2BP4BP6

The NM_000492.4(CFTR):​c.1516A>G​(p.Ile506Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00028 in 1,612,486 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I506M) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00034 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CFTR
NM_000492.4 missense

Scores

5
8
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.79

Publications

25 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFTR (HGNC:1884): (CF transmembrane conductance regulator) This gene encodes a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. The encoded protein functions as a chloride channel, making it unique among members of this protein family, and controls ion and water secretion and absorption in epithelial tissues. Channel activation is mediated by cycles of regulatory domain phosphorylation, ATP-binding by the nucleotide-binding domains, and ATP hydrolysis. Mutations in this gene cause cystic fibrosis, the most common lethal genetic disorder in populations of Northern European descent. The most frequently occurring mutation in cystic fibrosis, DeltaF508, results in impaired folding and trafficking of the encoded protein. Multiple pseudogenes have been identified in the human genome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
CFTR-AS1 (HGNC:40144): (CFTR antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 16 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 24 uncertain in NM_000492.4
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr7-117559589-C-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 53278.
PP2
Missense variant in the gene, where a lot of missense mutations are associated with disease in ClinVar. The gene has 197 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 46 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: -3.1397 (below the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: -1.0868 (below the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to hereditary chronic pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis, congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.37776813).
BP6
Variant 7-117559587-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-117559587-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 7131.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000492.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CFTR
NM_000492.4
MANE Select
c.1516A>Gp.Ile506Val
missense
Exon 11 of 27NP_000483.3
CFTR-AS1
NR_149084.1
n.221+1146T>C
intron
N/A

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CFTR
ENST00000003084.11
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1516A>Gp.Ile506Val
missense
Exon 11 of 27ENSP00000003084.6
CFTR
ENST00000699602.1
c.1516A>Gp.Ile506Val
missense
Exon 11 of 27ENSP00000514471.1
CFTR
ENST00000426809.5
TSL:5
c.1426A>Gp.Ile476Val
missense
Exon 10 of 26ENSP00000389119.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000342
AC:
52
AN:
152040
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000368
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000366
AC:
92
AN:
251282
AF XY:
0.000361
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000723
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000493
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000979
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000274
AC:
400
AN:
1460328
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000288
AC XY:
209
AN XY:
726550
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000897
AC:
3
AN:
33444
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00112
AC:
50
AN:
44704
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000153
AC:
4
AN:
26108
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39622
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000116
AC:
10
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53326
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000520
AC:
3
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000264
AC:
293
AN:
1110772
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000613
AC:
37
AN:
60352
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21
43
64
86
107
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000342
AC:
52
AN:
152158
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000228
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
74404
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000722
AC:
3
AN:
41534
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00137
AC:
21
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000368
AC:
25
AN:
67934
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000474
AC:
1
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
7
9
11
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000419
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000559
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000465
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
0.000362
AC:
44
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cystic fibrosis Uncertain:3Benign:4
Oct 01, 1990
OMIM
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 15, 2024
Johns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins University
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign (PM2, PM5, BS4, BP6).

Feb 12, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Sep 10, 2025
Genomic Medicine Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 17, 2017
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 18, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:4
Apr 05, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27131402, 19914443, 33260873, 1977306, 32026723, 19324992, 19359498, 22975760)

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 15, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CFTR: PM5

Mar 18, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The CFTR c.1516A>G; p.Ile506Val variant (rs1800091) is reported in the literature in at least two individuals with a severe pathogenic variant on the opposite allele and no symptoms of cystic fibrosis (Kobayashi 1990). The p.Ile506Val variant is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 7131), and is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.036% (101/282,660 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database (v2.1.1). Computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.570). Additionally, other amino acid substitutions at this codon (Leu, Met, Ser, Thr) have been reported in individuals with cystic fibrosis (Castellani 2008, Chevalier-Porst 1994, Deufel 1994, Standvick 2001). While this variant is unlikely to be associated with classic cystic fibrosis, since an association with CFTR- related disorder cannot be excluded p.Ile506Val is classified as a variant of uncertain clinical significance. References: Castellani C et al. Consensus on the use and interpretation of cystic fibrosis mutation analysis in clinical practice. J Cyst Fibros. 2008 May;7(3):179-96. PMID: 18456578 Chevalier-Porst F et al. Mutation analysis in 600 French cystic fibrosis patients. J Med Genet. 1994 Jul;31(7):541-4. PMID: 7525963 Deufel A et al. Three novel mutations (I506S, S466X, 1651A-->T) in exon 10 of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) detected in patients of southern German descent. Hum Mutat. 1994;3(1):64-6. PMID: 7509683 Kobayashi K et al. Benign missense variations in the cystic fibrosis gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 47(4):611-5. PMID: 1977306 Strandvik B et al. Spectrum of mutations in the CFTR gene of patients with classical and atypical forms of cystic fibrosis from southwestern Sweden: identification of 12 novel mutations. Genet Test. 2001 5(3):235-42. PMID: 11788090

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:2
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 06, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary pancreatitis Benign:1
Apr 28, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.019
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.10
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.67
D
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.69
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.72
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.48
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.38
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.75
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L
PhyloP100
8.8
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.69
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.73
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.57
Sift
Uncertain
0.0040
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.059
T
Polyphen
0.99
D
Vest4
0.70
MVP
1.0
MPC
0.010
ClinPred
0.067
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.74
gMVP
0.87
Mutation Taster
=24/76
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800091; hg19: chr7-117199641; API