7-117627611-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_000492.4(CFTR):​c.3558A>G​(p.Gln1186Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000447 in 1,613,382 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00046 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CFTR
NM_000492.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.336
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFTR (HGNC:1884): (CF transmembrane conductance regulator) This gene encodes a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. The encoded protein functions as a chloride channel, making it unique among members of this protein family, and controls ion and water secretion and absorption in epithelial tissues. Channel activation is mediated by cycles of regulatory domain phosphorylation, ATP-binding by the nucleotide-binding domains, and ATP hydrolysis. Mutations in this gene cause cystic fibrosis, the most common lethal genetic disorder in populations of Northern European descent. The most frequently occurring mutation in cystic fibrosis, DeltaF508, results in impaired folding and trafficking of the encoded protein. Multiple pseudogenes have been identified in the human genome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 7-117627611-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-117627611-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 35869.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=9, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr7-117627611-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.336 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CFTRNM_000492.4 linkc.3558A>G p.Gln1186Gln synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 27 ENST00000003084.11 NP_000483.3 P13569-1A0A024R730

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CFTRENST00000003084.11 linkc.3558A>G p.Gln1186Gln synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 27 1 NM_000492.4 ENSP00000003084.6 P13569-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000276
AC:
42
AN:
152154
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000223
AC:
56
AN:
250650
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000170
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
135444
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000424
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000465
AC:
679
AN:
1461228
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000447
AC XY:
325
AN XY:
726904
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000533
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00119
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000276
AC:
42
AN:
152154
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000215
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74322
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000409
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000344
EpiCase
AF:
0.000655
EpiControl
AF:
0.000534

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:6
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 29, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16251901, 15536480) -

Jan 23, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

CFTR: BP4, BP7 -

Feb 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 10, 2020
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cystic fibrosis Uncertain:1Benign:3
Jul 23, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 12, 2014
Counsyl
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: literature only

- -

Nov 29, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2017
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Nov 20, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CFTR-related disorder Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.48
DANN
Benign
0.28

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800121; hg19: chr7-117267665; API