7-122506765-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_017954.11(CADPS2):c.1542+6484C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.26 in 150,544 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,303 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017954.11 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017954.11. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CADPS2 | NM_017954.11 | MANE Select | c.1542+6484C>T | intron | N/A | NP_060424.9 | |||
| CADPS2 | NM_001363389.2 | c.1542+6484C>T | intron | N/A | NP_001350318.1 | ||||
| CADPS2 | NM_001363390.2 | c.1542+6484C>T | intron | N/A | NP_001350319.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CADPS2 | ENST00000449022.7 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.1542+6484C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000398481.2 | |||
| CADPS2 | ENST00000412584.6 | TSL:1 | c.1542+6484C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000400401.2 | |||
| CADPS2 | ENST00000313070.11 | TSL:5 | c.1224+6484C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000325581.8 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.260 AC: 39131AN: 150458Hom.: 5295 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.260 AC: 39143AN: 150544Hom.: 5303 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.260 AC XY: 19066AN XY: 73462 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at