7-128252071-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000230.3(LEP):āc.53A>Gā(p.Tyr18Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000326 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000230.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEP | NM_000230.3 | c.53A>G | p.Tyr18Cys | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000308868.5 | |
LEP | XM_005250340.6 | c.53A>G | p.Tyr18Cys | missense_variant | 2/3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEP | ENST00000308868.5 | c.53A>G | p.Tyr18Cys | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_000230.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000374 AC: 94AN: 251496Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000294 AC XY: 40AN XY: 135922
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000334 AC: 488AN: 1461860Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 225AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74430
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 31, 2021 | This sequence change replaces tyrosine with cysteine at codon 18 of the LEP protein (p.Tyr18Cys). The tyrosine residue is highly conserved and there is a large physicochemical difference between tyrosine and cysteine. This variant is present in population databases (rs148407750, ExAC 0.3%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with morbid obesity (PMID: 28377240). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 910456). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The cysteine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. - |
Obesity due to congenital leptin deficiency Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 18, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
LEP-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 21, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at