7-128400835-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_000883.4(IMPDH1):c.561C>T(p.Asn187=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000452 in 1,614,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000047 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
IMPDH1
NM_000883.4 synonymous
NM_000883.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.211
Genes affected
IMPDH1 (HGNC:6052): (inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1) The protein encoded by this gene acts as a homotetramer to regulate cell growth. The encoded protein is an enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of xanthine monophosphate (XMP) from inosine-5'-monophosphate (IMP). This is the rate-limiting step in the de novo synthesis of guanine nucleotides. Defects in this gene are a cause of retinitis pigmentosa type 10 (RP10). Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 7-128400835-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-128400835-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 910850.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.211 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMPDH1 | NM_000883.4 | c.561C>T | p.Asn187= | synonymous_variant | 7/17 | ENST00000338791.11 | NP_000874.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMPDH1 | ENST00000338791.11 | c.561C>T | p.Asn187= | synonymous_variant | 7/17 | 2 | NM_000883.4 | ENSP00000345096 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152194Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
152194
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000318 AC: 8AN: 251488Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135922
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
251488
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135922
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000465 AC: 68AN: 1461838Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000536 AC XY: 39AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
68
AN:
1461838
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
727232
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152194Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74348
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
152194
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74348
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Leber congenital amaurosis 11 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 05, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at