7-140734663-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001374258.1(BRAF):c.2355A>G(p.Leu785=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000317 in 1,612,596 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00039 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
BRAF
NM_001374258.1 synonymous
NM_001374258.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.17
Genes affected
BRAF (HGNC:1097): (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) This gene encodes a protein belonging to the RAF family of serine/threonine protein kinases. This protein plays a role in regulating the MAP kinase/ERK signaling pathway, which affects cell division, differentiation, and secretion. Mutations in this gene, most commonly the V600E mutation, are the most frequently identified cancer-causing mutations in melanoma, and have been identified in various other cancers as well, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, colorectal cancer, thyroid carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, hairy cell leukemia and adenocarcinoma of lung. Mutations in this gene are also associated with cardiofaciocutaneous, Noonan, and Costello syndromes, which exhibit overlapping phenotypes. A pseudogene of this gene has been identified on the X chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
?
Variant 7-140734663-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-140734663-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 40399.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.17 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000391 (59/150704) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0101 (52/5124). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00795. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 34 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 59 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | NM_001374258.1 | c.2355A>G | p.Leu785= | synonymous_variant | 19/20 | ENST00000644969.2 | |
BRAF | NM_004333.6 | c.2235A>G | p.Leu745= | synonymous_variant | 18/18 | ENST00000646891.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | ENST00000644969.2 | c.2355A>G | p.Leu785= | synonymous_variant | 19/20 | NM_001374258.1 | |||
BRAF | ENST00000646891.2 | c.2235A>G | p.Leu745= | synonymous_variant | 18/18 | NM_004333.6 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000392 AC: 59AN: 150606Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
59
AN:
150606
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000938 AC: 236AN: 251488Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.000853 AC XY: 116AN XY: 135920
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
236
AN:
251488
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
116
AN XY:
135920
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000309 AC: 452AN: 1461892Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000267 AC XY: 194AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
452
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
194
AN XY:
727246
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000391 AC: 59AN: 150704Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000463 AC XY: 34AN XY: 73472
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
59
AN:
150704
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
73472
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 20, 2015 | p.Leu745Leu in exon 18 of BRAF: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, not located within t he splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 1.3% (113/8654) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadi nstitute.org; dbSNP rs56046546). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 07, 2015 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2023 | BRAF: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
RASopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel | Apr 18, 2017 | The filtering allele frequency of the c.2235A>G (p.Leu745=) variant in the BRAF gene is 1.11% (113/8654) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) - |
Noonan syndrome 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
BRAF-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 20, 2021 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
LEOPARD syndrome 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 17, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Feb 08, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at