7-140734702-G-C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_004333.6(BRAF):c.2196C>G(p.Ser732Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000124 in 1,612,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000040 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRAF
NM_004333.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.184

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRAF (HGNC:1097): (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) This gene encodes a protein belonging to the RAF family of serine/threonine protein kinases. This protein plays a role in regulating the MAP kinase/ERK signaling pathway, which affects cell division, differentiation, and secretion. Mutations in this gene, most commonly the V600E mutation, are the most frequently identified cancer-causing mutations in melanoma, and have been identified in various other cancers as well, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, colorectal cancer, thyroid carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, hairy cell leukemia and adenocarcinoma of lung. Mutations in this gene are also associated with cardiofaciocutaneous, Noonan, and Costello syndromes, which exhibit overlapping phenotypes. A pseudogene of this gene has been identified on the X chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

BRAF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 7-140734702-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-140734702-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 417227.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.184 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000133 (194/1461864) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000168 (187/1112000). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000148. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 88 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRAF	NM_001374258.1 link	c.2316C>G	p.Ser772Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 20	ENST00000644969.2	NP_001361187.1
BRAF	NM_004333.6 link	c.2196C>G	p.Ser732Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 18	ENST00000646891.2	NP_004324.2	P15056

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRAF	ENST00000644969.2 link	c.2316C>G	p.Ser772Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 20		NM_001374258.1	ENSP00000496776.1		A0A2R8Y8E0
BRAF	ENST00000646891.2 link	c.2196C>G	p.Ser732Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 18		NM_004333.6	ENSP00000493543.1		P15056

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000399

AC:

AN:

150208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000246

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000738

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000596

AC:

AN:

251484

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000589

AC XY:

AN XY:

135920

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000105

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000133

AC:

194

AN:

1461864

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000399

AC:

AN:

150208

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000410

AC XY:

AN XY:

73136

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000246

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000738

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000947

Hom.:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Apr 02, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BRAF: BP4, BP7 -

Noonan syndrome 7

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

LEOPARD syndrome 3

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 30, 2018

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Ser732Ser in Exon 18 of BRAF: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 9/11716 European chro mosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.gs.washington. edu/EVS; dbSNP rs142592480). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BP4, BP7. -

BRAF-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 30, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jun 21, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

RASopathy

Benign:1

Dec 04, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.69

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over