Menu
GeneBe

7-140776898-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001374258.1(BRAF):c.1814+14G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00015 in 1,608,754 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BRAF
NM_001374258.1 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0150
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRAF (HGNC:1097): (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) This gene encodes a protein belonging to the RAF family of serine/threonine protein kinases. This protein plays a role in regulating the MAP kinase/ERK signaling pathway, which affects cell division, differentiation, and secretion. Mutations in this gene, most commonly the V600E mutation, are the most frequently identified cancer-causing mutations in melanoma, and have been identified in various other cancers as well, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, colorectal cancer, thyroid carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, hairy cell leukemia and adenocarcinoma of lung. Mutations in this gene are also associated with cardiofaciocutaneous, Noonan, and Costello syndromes, which exhibit overlapping phenotypes. A pseudogene of this gene has been identified on the X chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 7-140776898-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-140776898-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 44809.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=4, Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000105 (16/152244) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00145 (7/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00068. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 11 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 16 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRAFNM_001374258.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1814+14G>A intron_variant ENST00000644969.2
BRAFNM_004333.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1694+14G>A intron_variant ENST00000646891.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRAFENST00000644969.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1814+14G>A intron_variant NM_001374258.1
BRAFENST00000646891.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1694+14G>A intron_variant NM_004333.6 P4
ENST00000700122.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.502+2030C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152126
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000287
AC:
72
AN:
251138
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000361
AC XY:
49
AN XY:
135734
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000290
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000969
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000155
AC:
226
AN:
1456510
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000183
AC XY:
133
AN XY:
724870
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000541
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000382
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152244
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000143
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000102
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 29, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineAug 16, 2012c.1694+14G>A in Intron 13 of BRAF: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 2/7020 European American chromosomes from a broad popula tion by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS;). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 01, 2020Variant summary: BRAF c.1694+14G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00029 in 251138 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency is approximately 114 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRAF causing Noonan Syndrome And Related Conditions phenotype (2.5e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1694+14G>A in individuals affected with Noonan Syndrome And Related Conditions and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant has been reported (PTPN11 c.124A>G, p.Thr42Ala), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Noonan syndrome 7 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
LEOPARD syndrome 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
RASopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 12, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
Cadd
Benign
16
Dann
Benign
0.82

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs184144181; hg19: chr7-140476698; API