7-140778013-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 17 ACMG points: 17P and 0B. PM1PM2PP2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_004333.6(BRAF):c.1495A>G(p.Lys499Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004333.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | ENST00000644969.2 | c.1615A>G | p.Lys539Glu | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 20 | NM_001374258.1 | ENSP00000496776.1 | |||
BRAF | ENST00000646891.2 | c.1495A>G | p.Lys499Glu | missense_variant | Exon 12 of 18 | NM_004333.6 | ENSP00000493543.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 Pathogenic:4Other:1
- -
Amino acid change identical t o known pathogenic variant has been previously reported with established evidence (ClinVar ID: VCV000013976, PMID:16474404). Different pathogenic amino acid change has been reported with sufficient evidence at the same codon (ClinVar ID: VCV000040371,VCV000040372, PMID:18042262). The variant is located in a well-established functional domain or exonic hotspot, where pathogenic variants have frequently reported. In silico prediction tools and conservation analysis predicted that this variant was probably damaging to the protein structure/function (REVEL: 0.829>=0.6). A missense variant is a common mechanism associated with Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome. It is absent from the gnomAD v2.1.1 dataset. ATherefore, this variant is classified as pathogenic according to the recommendation of ACMG/AMP guideline. -
PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3, PP5 -
Variant interpreted as Pathogenic and reported on 02-12-2018 by Lab or GTR ID Kaizer Franz Josef Hospital. GenomeConnect-CFC International assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
- -
not provided Pathogenic:2
- -
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Missense variants in this gene are a common cause of disease and they are underrepresented in the general population; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22824468, 23505473, 18456719, 34184824, 18413255, 23093928, 16474404, 18042262, 19376813, 24803665, 16439621, 30462361, 31560489, 32369273, 28404629) -
Lung cancer;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C1835047:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 1;C3150970:Noonan syndrome 7;C3150971:LEOPARD syndrome 3;CN029449:Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1
PM2_Supporting+PP2+PS3+PS4+PS2 -
RASopathy Pathogenic:1
Variant summary: BRAF c.1495A>G (p.Lys499Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the protein kinase domain (IPR000719) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 246384 control chromosomes (in gnomAD and publication data). c.1495A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Cardiofaciocutaneous Syndrome (Rodriguez-Viciana 2006, Niihori 2006, Schulz 2008). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. Two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and both of them demonstrated an increased kinase activity for the variant protein (Rodriguez-Viciana 2006, Niihori 2006). Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic. -
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Pathogenic:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at