7-146116828-T-G

Variant names:

• chr7-146116828-T-G
• rs549396215
• NM_014141.6:c.-49T>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS1 BS2

The NM_014141.6(CNTNAP2):​c.-49T>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00205 in 1,432,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 35 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 (5 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 (30 hom.)
• Consequence: CNTNAP2 NM_014141.6 5_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -1.17

Genes affected

CNTNAP2 (HGNC:13830): (contactin associated protein 2) This gene encodes a member of the neurexin family which functions in the vertebrate nervous system as cell adhesion molecules and receptors. This protein, like other neurexin proteins, contains epidermal growth factor repeats and laminin G domains. In addition, it includes an F5/8 type C domain, discoidin/neuropilin- and fibrinogen-like domains, thrombospondin N-terminal-like domains and a putative PDZ binding site. This protein is localized at the juxtaparanodes of myelinated axons, and mediates interactions between neurons and glia during nervous system development and is also involved in localization of potassium channels within differentiating axons. This gene encompasses almost 1.5% of chromosome 7 and is one of the largest genes in the human genome. It is directly bound and regulated by forkhead box protein P2, a transcription factor related to speech and language development. This gene has been implicated in multiple neurodevelopmental disorders, including Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, schizophrenia, epilepsy, autism, ADHD and intellectual disability. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
• BP6: Variant 7-146116828-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-146116828-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136837.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00208 (2664/1280540) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0169 (1289/76432). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0161. There are 30 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 1633 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 19. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CNTNAP2	NM_014141.6	c.-49T>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 24	ENST00000361727.8	NP_054860.1
CNTNAP2	XM_017011950.3	c.-49T>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 14		XP_016867439.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CNTNAP2	ENST00000361727	c.-49T>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 1 of 24	1	NM_014141.6	ENSP00000354778.3
CNTNAP2	ENST00000625365	c.-49T>G		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 4	5		ENSP00000485955.1
CNTNAP2	ENST00000637150.1	n.-120T>G		upstream_gene_variant		5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00183 AC: 278 AN: 152152 Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000241

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00308

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.0150

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.0178

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0127

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00106

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00450 AC: 615 AN: 136780 Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00534 AC XY: 396 AN XY: 74200

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000616

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00163

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.0134

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0171

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00138

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00517

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00208 AC: 2664 AN: 1280540 Hom.: 30 Cov.: 19 AF XY: 0.00258 AC XY: 1633 AN XY: 633330

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000375

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00184

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0129

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000286

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0169

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000978

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000726

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00379

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00183 AC: 278 AN: 152270 Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00219 AC XY: 163 AN XY: 74452

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000241

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00307

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.0150

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.0178

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00106

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00331

Alfa AF: 0.00319 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.00161

Asia WGS AF: 0.00722 AC: 26 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1

Feb 06, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Cortical dysplasia-focal epilepsy syndrome Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.81
CADD	Benign	5.6
DANN	Benign	0.66

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.010		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs549396215; hg19: chr7-145813920;