7-148217456-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_014141.6(CNTNAP2):c.3179C>T(p.Ala1060Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000929 in 1,614,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014141.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNTNAP2 | NM_014141.6 | c.3179C>T | p.Ala1060Val | missense_variant | Exon 19 of 24 | ENST00000361727.8 | NP_054860.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000160 AC: 4AN: 250406Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000148 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135326
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000958 AC: 140AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000880 AC XY: 64AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74482
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Identified in an individual with persistent developmental stuttering; however, additional information regarding the phenotype of the individual and information about parental testing were not provided and the authors concluded that CNTNAP2 variants were not associated with stuttering (Han et al., 2014); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24807205, 19896112) -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
Cortical dysplasia-focal epilepsy syndrome Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 1060 of the CNTNAP2 protein (p.Ala1060Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs369254596, gnomAD 0.006%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with persistent developmental stuttering (PMID: 24807205). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 205282). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The valine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The p.A1060V variant (also known as c.3179C>T), located in coding exon 19 of the CNTNAP2 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 3179. The alanine at codon 1060 is replaced by valine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Autism, susceptibility to, 15;C2750246:Cortical dysplasia-focal epilepsy syndrome Uncertain:1
- -
CNTNAP2-related disorder Uncertain:1
The CNTNAP2 c.3179C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ala1060Val. This variant has been reported in an individual with persistent developmental stuttering ( Han TU et al 2014. PubMed ID: 24807205). This variant is reported in 0.0056% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at