7-150520167-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_153236.4(GIMAP7):c.193C>T(p.Pro65Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000867 in 1,613,996 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153236.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_153236.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIMAP7 | NM_153236.4 | MANE Select | c.193C>T | p.Pro65Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_694968.1 | Q8NHV1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIMAP7 | ENST00000313543.5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.193C>T | p.Pro65Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000315474.4 | Q8NHV1 | |
| GIMAP7 | ENST00000955193.1 | c.193C>T | p.Pro65Ser | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000625252.1 | |||
| GIMAP7 | ENST00000955194.1 | c.193C>T | p.Pro65Ser | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000625253.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251390 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000752 AC: 11AN: 1461832Hom.: 0 Cov.: 49 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 6AN XY: 727220 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74332 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at