7-150720269-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_130759.4(GIMAP1):āc.265T>Cā(p.Ser89Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00113 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_130759.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMAP1 | NM_130759.4 | c.265T>C | p.Ser89Pro | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000307194.6 | |
GIMAP1-GIMAP5 | NM_001199577.2 | c.265T>C | p.Ser89Pro | missense_variant | 3/6 | ||
GIMAP1-GIMAP5 | NM_001303630.2 | c.18+1179T>C | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMAP1 | ENST00000307194.6 | c.265T>C | p.Ser89Pro | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_130759.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00637 AC: 968AN: 152060Hom.: 10 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00165 AC: 415AN: 251156Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00125 AC XY: 170AN XY: 135852
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000588 AC: 859AN: 1461878Hom.: 9 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000487 AC XY: 354AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00637 AC: 969AN: 152178Hom.: 10 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00612 AC XY: 455AN XY: 74400
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 08, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at