7-150951110-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000238.4(KCNH2):ā€‹c.1956T>Cā€‹(p.Tyr652Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.637 in 1,608,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 331,619 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.70 ( 38734 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes š‘“: 0.63 ( 292885 hom. )

Consequence

KCNH2
NM_000238.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.277
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCNH2 (HGNC:6251): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2) This gene encodes a component of a voltage-activated potassium channel found in cardiac muscle, nerve cells, and microglia. Four copies of this protein interact with one copy of the KCNE2 protein to form a functional potassium channel. Mutations in this gene can cause long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2). Transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 7-150951110-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-150951110-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 200230.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-150951110-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.277 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.878 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
KCNH2NM_000238.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1956T>C p.Tyr652Tyr synonymous_variant 8/15 ENST00000262186.10 NP_000229.1 Q12809-1Q15BH2A0A090N8Q0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KCNH2ENST00000262186.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1956T>C p.Tyr652Tyr synonymous_variant 8/151 NM_000238.4 ENSP00000262186.5 Q12809-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.701
AC:
106660
AN:
152070
Hom.:
38677
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.886
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.620
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.618
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.898
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.669
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.637
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.630
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.604
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.674
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.663
AC:
164327
AN:
247964
Hom.:
55682
AF XY:
0.658
AC XY:
88305
AN XY:
134152
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.898
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.649
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.608
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.907
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.669
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.633
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.603
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.646
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.630
AC:
917867
AN:
1456742
Hom.:
292885
Cov.:
53
AF XY:
0.631
AC XY:
456738
AN XY:
724184
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.901
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.648
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.608
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.910
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.671
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.627
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.608
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.649
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.702
AC:
106780
AN:
152188
Hom.:
38734
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.704
AC XY:
52384
AN XY:
74380
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.886
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.618
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.898
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.669
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.637
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.604
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.679
Alfa
AF:
0.636
Hom.:
13341
Bravo
AF:
0.712
Asia WGS
AF:
0.763
AC:
2653
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.611
EpiControl
AF:
0.604

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 05, 2019The c.1956T>C (p.Tyr652Tyr) variant in KCNH2 is classified as benign because it has been found in 67% (186322/279284) of chromosomes, including 63675 homozygotes, by the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/7-150648198-A-G). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 12, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart InstituteMay 31, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJun 29, 2017- -
Long QT syndrome 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabAug 19, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Long QT syndrome Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingCohesion PhenomicsSep 23, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 19, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 15, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
1.2
DANN
Benign
0.50
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1137617; hg19: chr7-150648198; COSMIC: COSV51214965; API