7-151054051-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_004935.4(CDK5):c.837G>C(p.Glu279Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000138 in 1,450,018 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E279E) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004935.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- lissencephaly 7 with cerebellar hypoplasiaInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- lissencephaly with cerebellar hypoplasiaInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004935.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDK5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.837G>C | p.Glu279Asp | missense | Exon 12 of 12 | ENSP00000419782.1 | Q00535-1 | ||
| CDK5 | TSL:1 | c.741G>C | p.Glu247Asp | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000297518.4 | Q00535-2 | ||
| CDK5 | c.873G>C | p.Glu291Asp | missense | Exon 12 of 12 | ENSP00000561123.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000138 AC: 2AN: 1450018Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000278 AC XY: 2AN XY: 720052 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at