7-20723163-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001163941.2(ABCB5):c.2569G>A(p.Ala857Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,613,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A857V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001163941.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCB5 | ENST00000404938.7  | c.2569G>A | p.Ala857Thr | missense_variant | Exon 21 of 28 | 1 | NM_001163941.2 | ENSP00000384881.2 | ||
| ABCB5 | ENST00000258738.10  | c.1234G>A | p.Ala412Thr | missense_variant | Exon 12 of 19 | 1 | ENSP00000258738.6 | |||
| ABCB5 | ENST00000441315.1  | n.70G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 8 | 2 | ENSP00000398692.1 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes   AF:  0.000105  AC: 16AN: 152148Hom.:  1  Cov.: 33 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.000346  AC: 87AN: 251416 AF XY:  0.000316   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.000105  AC: 154AN: 1461846Hom.:  0  Cov.: 33 AF XY:  0.000109  AC XY: 79AN XY: 727220 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome   AF:  0.000105  AC: 16AN: 152148Hom.:  1  Cov.: 33 AF XY:  0.000121  AC XY: 9AN XY: 74336 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at