7-44111533-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_001129.5(AEBP1):c.1743C>A(p.Cys581*) variant causes a stop gained change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000437 in 1,602,620 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001129.5 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic-like, 2Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001129.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEBP1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1743C>A | p.Cys581* | stop_gained | Exon 15 of 21 | ENSP00000223357.3 | Q8IUX7-1 | ||
| AEBP1 | c.1755C>A | p.Cys585* | stop_gained | Exon 15 of 21 | ENSP00000580499.1 | ||||
| AEBP1 | c.1737C>A | p.Cys579* | stop_gained | Exon 15 of 21 | ENSP00000580497.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 238444 AF XY: 0.00
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000276 AC: 4AN: 1450442Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000277 AC XY: 2AN XY: 721428 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74356 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at