7-5622946-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_207111.4(RNF216):c.2686G>T(p.Val896Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,682 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V896I) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_207111.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNF216 | NM_207111.4 | c.2686G>T | p.Val896Phe | missense_variant | 17/17 | ENST00000389902.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNF216 | ENST00000389902.8 | c.2686G>T | p.Val896Phe | missense_variant | 17/17 | 1 | NM_207111.4 | P4 | |
RNF216 | ENST00000425013.6 | c.2515G>T | p.Val839Phe | missense_variant | 17/17 | 1 | A1 | ||
RNF216 | ENST00000389900.8 | c.*1803G>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 16/16 | 1 | ||||
RNF216 | ENST00000469375.1 | n.903G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461682Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727126
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cerebellar ataxia-hypogonadism syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at