Menu
GeneBe

7-5986753-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):​c.2006+6G>A variant causes a splice donor region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0555 in 1,573,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,348 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (β˜…β˜…β˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.052 ( 521 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.056 ( 4827 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 splice_donor_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00007389
2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.219
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 7-5986753-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5986753-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 91324.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr7-5986753-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.325 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2006+6G>A splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000265849.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.2006+6G>A splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_000535.7 P3P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0516
AC:
7834
AN:
151924
Hom.:
520
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0175
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0323
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0629
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.338
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.159
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0875
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0823
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0416
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0461
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0760
AC:
17203
AN:
226258
Hom.:
1548
AF XY:
0.0797
AC XY:
9795
AN XY:
122938
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0151
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0228
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0597
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.338
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.152
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0866
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0413
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0650
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0559
AC:
79399
AN:
1421062
Hom.:
4827
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.0583
AC XY:
41171
AN XY:
706020
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0160
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0639
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.352
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.143
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0877
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0392
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0675
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0516
AC:
7840
AN:
152044
Hom.:
521
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0559
AC XY:
4157
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0175
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0323
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0629
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.338
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.159
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0875
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0417
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0523
Alfa
AF:
0.0434
Hom.:
70
Bravo
AF:
0.0440
Asia WGS
AF:
0.248
AC:
860
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 21, 2018- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 05, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJul 07, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterMay 31, 2017- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24710284) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 21, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 10, 2014- -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Sep 05, 2013MAF >1% -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-Γ’β‚¬Ε‘Γƒβ€žΓƒΒΊThe PMS2, c.2006+6G>A variant was identified in 7% of 253542 control alleles in the Genome Aggregation Consortium (February 27, 2017). According to ACMG guidelines for variant classification based on allele frequency, category BA1, this variant is considered benign and has not been further reviewed (Richards 2015).Γ’β‚¬Ε‘Γƒβ€žΓƒΒΉ -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000074
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs111905775; hg19: chr7-6026384; COSMIC: COSV56219357; API