7-5986976-T-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):​c.1789A>T​(p.Thr597Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.014 in 1,614,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 207 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0089 ( 10 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.014 ( 197 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:27O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.538
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0039007366).
BP6
Variant 7-5986976-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5986976-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41707.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr7-5986976-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-5986976-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00891 (1357/152322) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0159 (1083/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0151. There are 10 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 620 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 10 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1789A>T p.Thr597Ser missense_variant 11/15 ENST00000265849.12 NP_000526.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.1789A>T p.Thr597Ser missense_variant 11/151 NM_000535.7 ENSP00000265849 P3P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00890
AC:
1354
AN:
152204
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00309
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00426
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00330
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00860
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00828
AC:
2083
AN:
251444
Hom.:
13
AF XY:
0.00845
AC XY:
1148
AN XY:
135906
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00302
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00487
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00370
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0144
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00799
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0145
AC:
21181
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
197
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0142
AC XY:
10337
AN XY:
727214
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00224
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00356
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00195
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00515
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00337
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0109
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00891
AC:
1357
AN:
152322
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00832
AC XY:
620
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00426
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00497
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00330
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00851
Alfa
AF:
0.0120
Hom.:
8
Bravo
AF:
0.00858
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0178
AC:
66
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0210
AC:
81
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00431
AC:
19
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0153
AC:
132
ExAC
AF:
0.00821
AC:
997
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:27Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 11, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jun 24, 2014- -
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 24, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.May 11, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterJun 20, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJun 01, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtMar 07, 2016- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 21, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingVantari GeneticsFeb 04, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 18, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsJan 12, 2018- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2024PMS2: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 17, 2023- -
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPathway GenomicsJul 24, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Oct 10, 2014MAF >1% -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The PMS2 p.Thr597Ser variant was identified in 27 of 746 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.036) from Dutch, American, British and French individuals or families with HNPCC, early-onset CRC, MAP or breast cancer and was identified in 37 of 1922 chromosomes (frequency: 0.02) from healthy individuals (Hendriks 2006, Balogh 2006, Lefevre 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1805318) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (classified 10x as benign: InSiGHT, Invitae, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Emory Genetics Laboratory, Vantari Genetics, PreventionGenetics, Counsyl, Color Genomics, Biesecker Lab/NIH; 1x likely benign: Pathway Genomics; 1x not provided: ITMI), Clinvitae (7x), MutDB (UniProt Category: Polymorphism), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (12x not pathogenic), and the Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database (3x). The variant was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, COSMIC, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, or the Insight Hereditary Tumors Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 2380 of 277222 chromosomes (15 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.009 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: European (Non-Finnish) in 1893 of 126716 chromosomes (freq: 0.015) Functional data suggest conflicting effects for this variant. An in vitro pull-down assay demonstrating that this SNP results in defective protein-protein interaction with MLH1, despite the fact that the alteration is outside the putative MLH1 interaction domain, suggests an increased risk factor for tumourigenesis in HNPCC. However, a cell-free MMR functional assay of VUS in PMS2 using MLH1/PMS2 heterodimer to restore a plasmid restriction enzyme site demonstrated 70% activity and was not considered MMR-deficient relative to known pathogenic controls. The p.Thr597Ser residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.079
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.63
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
0.13
DANN
Benign
0.45
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.068
T;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.4
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.10
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.36
T;T;.;T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0039
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.45
N;N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.056
Sift
Benign
0.78
T;T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.71
T;T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0040
B;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.16
MutPred
0.19
Gain of disorder (P = 0.0411);.;.;.;.;
MVP
0.31
MPC
0.034
ClinPred
0.0048
T
GERP RS
-11
Varity_R
0.030
gMVP
0.16

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1805318; hg19: chr7-6026607; COSMIC: COSV104554309; API