7-5987054-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):​c.1711C>A​(p.Leu571Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00176 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L571R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0073 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:25O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.991

Publications

22 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
PMS2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Lynch syndrome 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • malignant pancreatic neoplasm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 11 benign, 43 uncertain in NM_000535.7
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0045543313).
BP6
Variant 7-5987054-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5987054-G-T is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 41706.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00733 (1116/152280) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0213 (886/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0202. There are 17 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 530 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 17 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkc.1711C>A p.Leu571Ile missense_variant Exon 11 of 15 ENST00000265849.12 NP_000526.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkc.1711C>A p.Leu571Ile missense_variant Exon 11 of 15 1 NM_000535.7 ENSP00000265849.7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00733
AC:
1115
AN:
152162
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0213
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00964
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000838
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0115
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00226
AC:
567
AN:
251366
AF XY:
0.00198
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0204
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00321
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000496
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000888
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00310
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00118
AC:
1725
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00108
AC XY:
783
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0225
AC:
753
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00351
AC:
157
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000459
AC:
12
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000580
AC:
5
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53410
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00728
AC:
42
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000542
AC:
603
AN:
1112010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00253
AC:
153
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
110
221
331
442
552
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
40
80
120
160
200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00733
AC:
1116
AN:
152280
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00712
AC XY:
530
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0213
AC:
886
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00956
AC:
146
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10608
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000838
AC:
57
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0113
AC:
24
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
51
102
153
204
255
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00284
Hom.:
6
Bravo
AF:
0.00884
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00104
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0172
AC:
76
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000814
AC:
7
ExAC
AF:
0.00243
AC:
295
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00125
EpiControl
AF:
0.00148

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:25Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:7
Jun 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PMS2: BP4, BS1, BS2

Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

Mar 20, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 16, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

not specified Benign:5Other:1
Oct 06, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

Jan 06, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 07, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 30, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Dec 09, 2014
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Jan 22, 2016
Vantari Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 30, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 05, 2025
Spanish MMR Variant Interpretation Working Group
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The PMS2 variant c.1711C>A replaces leucine with isoleucine at codon 571 of the PMS2 protein (p.Leu571Ile). The leucine residue is weakly conserved, and there is a small physicochemical difference between leucine and isoleucine. The variant c.1711C>A has a Maximum Credible Allele Frequency (MCAF) above 0.28% in gnomAD v4.1.0 database (24 homozygotes) (BA1; the allele frequency data may be inaccurate due to possible PMS2CL pseudogene interference). It is a missense variant with a MAPP+PolyPhen-2 prior probability of pathogenicity of <0.11, and it is not predicted to affect splicing according to MaxEntScan/NNSplice/SpliceAI algorithms (BP4). There are no other described class 4/5 variants located at the same residue. Its functional odds for Pathogenicity are between 0.05 and 0.48 as per CIMRA assay (BS3_supp). It has been reported in our Spanish cohort in a patient affected with CRC showing PMS2 loss of expression and co-occurrence with a PMS2 likely pathogenic variant (phase unknown). Based on the available evidence, this variant is classified as Benign (Class 1).

Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:5
Jan 31, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.

Jul 19, 2016
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 15, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 16, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.

Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The PMS2 p.Leu571Ile variant was identified 5 of 2018 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from Dutch and American individuals or families with Lynch Syndrome, suspected Lynch Syndrome, or individuals being ascertained for atherosclerosis phenotypes (van der Klift 2016, Johnston 2012, Clendenning 2006). The variant was identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs63750055) as “other”, ClinVar (classified as likely benign, reviewed by an expert panel; classified as likely benign by InSIGHT, Vantari Genetics, Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics; benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Invitae; uncertain significance by Biesecker Lab/Human Development Section-NIH; and classification not provided by ITMI), Clinvitae (4X), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (3X), and Insight Hereditary Tumors Database; but was not identified in COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database and the Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 760 (10 homozygous) of 277148 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following population at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 506 (10 homozygous) of 23994 chromosomes (freq: 0.021). The p.Leu571 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant was identified by our laboratory in an individual with a co-occurring pathogenic variant (PMS2, c.2276-?_2445+?del), increasing the likelihood this variant does not have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Sep 05, 2013
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:research

MAF >1% in African population

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.060
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.58
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
0.039
DANN
Benign
0.83
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.062
T;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.3
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.021
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.41
T;T;.;T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0046
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
-0.99
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.40
N;N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.022
Sift
Benign
0.47
T;T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.47
T;T;.;.;.
Vest4
0.16
ClinPred
0.00084
T
GERP RS
-3.3
Varity_R
0.023
gMVP
0.10
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs63750055; hg19: chr7-6026685; COSMIC: COSV56221469; API