7-5987196-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):​c.1569C>G​(p.Ser523Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00355 in 1,614,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 66 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0052 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 57 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.494
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 7-5987196-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5987196-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 91306.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr7-5987196-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.494 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00518 (789/152236) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00404 (275/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00365. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 497 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkc.1569C>G p.Ser523Ser synonymous_variant 11/15 ENST00000265849.12 NP_000526.2 P54278-1Q7Z3Q2B4DGM0

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkc.1569C>G p.Ser523Ser synonymous_variant 11/151 NM_000535.7 ENSP00000265849.7 P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00519
AC:
789
AN:
152118
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000197
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0449
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00404
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00555
AC:
1395
AN:
251154
Hom.:
27
AF XY:
0.00537
AC XY:
729
AN XY:
135820
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000248
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000347
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00497
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0409
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00365
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00338
AC:
4934
AN:
1461826
Hom.:
57
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.00333
AC XY:
2418
AN XY:
727200
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000329
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0383
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00313
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00518
AC:
789
AN:
152236
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00668
AC XY:
497
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0449
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00404
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00475
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00174
EpiCase
AF:
0.00305
EpiControl
AF:
0.00255

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:24
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalMar 04, 2025- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 18, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 07, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 21, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 14, 2021- -
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJun 10, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024PMS2: BP4, BP7 -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 21, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 24, 2015- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsApr 09, 2018- -
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterSep 07, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJun 08, 2021- -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Sep 05, 2013Synonymous variant with no effect on splicing or mRNA expression (treated with NMD inhibitor) -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 04, 2025- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The PMS2 p.Ser523= variant was identified in 2 of 1038 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with colorectal cancer (Borras 2013, Niessen 2009). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs141458772) as With Likely benign allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, GeneDx, Prevention Genetics; as likely benign by InSight, Ambry Genetics), Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (1X class2), Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (1X class2). The variant was not identified in the COGR, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 1721(31 homozygous) of 276904 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.006 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The silent p.Ser523= variant did not affect mRNA processing or stability by functional analysis at mRNA and protein level (Borras 2013). The p.Ser523= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. However, 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Ovarian neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJan 01, 2019- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
1.2
DANN
Benign
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141458772; hg19: chr7-6026827; COSMIC: COSV56223665; API