7-5987209-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The ENST00000265849.12(PMS2):c.1556A>G(p.Tyr519Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000607 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y519H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000053 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
PMS2
ENST00000265849.12 missense
ENST00000265849.12 missense
Scores
19
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.84
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010536045).
BP6
Variant 7-5987209-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5987209-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135939.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=1, Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=7}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMS2 | NM_000535.7 | c.1556A>G | p.Tyr519Cys | missense_variant | 11/15 | ENST00000265849.12 | NP_000526.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMS2 | ENST00000265849.12 | c.1556A>G | p.Tyr519Cys | missense_variant | 11/15 | 1 | NM_000535.7 | ENSP00000265849 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
152166
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000836 AC: 21AN: 251300Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000103 AC XY: 14AN XY: 135858
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
21
AN:
251300
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
135858
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000534 AC: 78AN: 1461788Hom.: 0 Cov.: 45 AF XY: 0.0000578 AC XY: 42AN XY: 727190
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
78
AN:
1461788
Hom.:
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
727190
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152284Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74448
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
152284
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74448
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
12
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:3
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 23, 2019 | - - |
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 16, 2017 | This variant is denoted PMS2 c.1556A>G at the cDNA level, p.Tyr519Cys (Y519C) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Tyrosine to a Cysteine (TAT>TGT). PMS2 Tyr519Cys has been reported in at least two individuals with suspected Lynch syndrome, one of whom was also found to harbor a pathogenic MSH2 variant (Yurgelun 2015, Lagerstedt-Robinson 2016). It was also identified in an individual with an MSI-high, PMS2-deficient rectal cancer and a truncating PMS2 variant (Nomura 2015). However, the methodology used by Nomura et al. would not be able to distinguish whether Tyr519Cys was identified in PMS2 or its pseudogene, PMS2CL. This variant demonstrated efficient mismatch repair activity in comparison to a repair-deficient control in an in vitro functional assay (Drost 2013). Although this variant was observed in 1000 Genomes, population data in this region of PMS2 are not considered reliable due to high pseudogene homology. Since Tyrosine and Cysteine differ in polarity, charge, size or other properties, this is considered a non-conservative amino acid substitution. PMS2 Tyr519Cys occurs at a position that is not conserved and is not located in a known functional domain. In silico analyses predict that this variant is unlikely to alter protein structure or function. Based on currently available information, it is unclear whether PMS2 Tyr519Cys is pathogenic or benign. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
| Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PMS2 p.Tyr519Cys variant was identified in 10 of 2298 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from individuals or families with breast cancer or lynch syndrome (Balogh 2006, Lagerstedt-Robinson 2016, Yurgelun 2015). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs63750649) as “With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae and Ambry Genetics; as uncertain significance by Counsyl, GeneDx and Fulgent Genetics), Clinvitae, MutDB, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, and in Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (3x, effect unknown). The variant was not identified in COGR, Cosmic, or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 24 of 277074 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Other in 2 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Latino in 11 of 34416 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), European in 7 of 126622 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 4 of 30780 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001); it was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The p.Tyr519 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. A functional in vitro study by Drost (2013) identified MMR activity of the variant in comparison to a negative control suggesting a neutral effect of the variant on protein function. In addition two patients identified with the c.1556A>G variant were also found to have a co-occurring pathogenic variant: MSH2, c.2210+1G>A and PMS2, c.1492del11, suggesting that the c.1556A>G variant may not be of clinical significance (Yurgelun 2015, Nomura 2015). In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2022 | PMS2: PS3:Supporting, BP4 - |
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 26, 2022 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 06, 2021 | - - |
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 15, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
| Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 14, 2015 | - - |
Lynch syndrome 4 Uncertain:2
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 04, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jun 01, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 08, 2024 | Variant summary: PMS2 c.1556A>G (p.Tyr519Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.1e-05 in 1614072 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00042 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3.7 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in PMS2 causing Lynch Syndrome phenotype (0.00011), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. c.1556A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Lynch syndrome-associated cancers or with suspected Lynch Syndrome (e.g., Yurgelun_2015, Nomura_2015, Lagerstedt-Robinson_2016, Balogh_2006, Okkels_2019, Li_2020), frequently along with PMS2 c.1559C>T (p.A520V; Yurgelun_2015, Nomura_2015, Okkels_2019). However, the variant was found not to segregate with disease in at least one family (e.g., Okkels_2019) and was also classified as a benign/likely benign polymorphism in several publications (e.g., Okkels_2019, Li_2020, Balogh_2006). These reports are not suggestive that the variant is associated with Lynch Syndrome. Additionally, co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (MSH2 c.2210+1G>A (Yurgelun_2015); PMS2 c.1492_1502del11 (p.Ser498GlyfsX3; Nomura_2015); MLH1 c.677+3A>G (Okkels_2019); MLH1 c.(1731+1_1732-1)_(*194_?)del, E16-19del (Okkels_2019)), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Several publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, suggesting the variant does not greatly disrupt normal protein function (e.g., Drost_2013, Nomura_2015, Okkels_2019). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 22290698, 17016615, 24027009, 27601186, 31391288, 26232782, 31433215, 25980754). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 135939). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Lynch syndrome 4;C5399763:Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
| Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 23, 2017 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 11, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
| Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;.;T;.
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;.;.;.
Polyphen
B;B;.;.;B
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of phosphorylation at Y519 (P = 0.0068);.;.;.;.;
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at