7-5987234-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):​c.1531A>G​(p.Thr511Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0266 in 1,614,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 678 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T511M) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.021 ( 53 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.027 ( 625 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:26O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.352

Publications

32 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
PMS2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Lynch syndrome 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • malignant pancreatic neoplasm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0029952526).
BP6
Variant 7-5987234-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5987234-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 41703.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0215 (3267/152240) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0277 (1886/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0267. There are 53 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1694 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 53 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkc.1531A>G p.Thr511Ala missense_variant Exon 11 of 15 ENST00000265849.12 NP_000526.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkc.1531A>G p.Thr511Ala missense_variant Exon 11 of 15 1 NM_000535.7 ENSP00000265849.7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3267
AN:
152122
Hom.:
53
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00632
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0381
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0538
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0277
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0230
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0246
AC:
6176
AN:
251328
AF XY:
0.0254
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00481
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0315
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0544
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0302
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0272
AC:
39709
AN:
1461826
Hom.:
625
Cov.:
47
AF XY:
0.0270
AC XY:
19627
AN XY:
727210
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00490
AC:
164
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0119
AC:
532
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0315
AC:
823
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0208
AC:
1797
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0516
AC:
2753
AN:
53388
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0271
AC:
156
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0288
AC:
31987
AN:
1111984
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0248
AC:
1497
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2403
4806
7208
9611
12014
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1186
2372
3558
4744
5930
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0215
AC:
3267
AN:
152240
Hom.:
53
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0228
AC XY:
1694
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00631
AC:
262
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0161
AC:
246
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0381
AC:
132
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0207
AC:
100
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0538
AC:
570
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0277
AC:
1886
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0227
AC:
48
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
162
324
486
648
810
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
40
80
120
160
200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0246
Hom.:
77
Bravo
AF:
0.0181
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0272
AC:
101
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0283
AC:
109
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00635
AC:
28
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0281
AC:
242
ExAC
AF:
0.0250
AC:
3041
EpiCase
AF:
0.0285
EpiControl
AF:
0.0268

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:26Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9Other:1
-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 28, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 03, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:7
May 11, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2015
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2017
Counsyl
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Oct 14, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 21, 2015
Vantari Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 02, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome Benign:2
Sep 05, 2013
International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:research

MAF >1% -

Sep 30, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

- -

Nov 06, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PMS2, EXON11, c.1531A>G, p.Thr511Ala, Benign (ACMG 5) The c.1531A>G variant was identified in 6 of 368 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.016) from individuals or families with HNPCC and Lynch syndrome; however, control chromosomes were not evaluated in these studies, thus the prevalence of this variant in the general population could not be determined. The variant was present in individuals that tested immunohistocompatibility PMS2 negative but positive for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH 6. Tumours were also found to be microsatellite instability high. (10479499_Basil_1999, 15256438_Nakagawa, 16619239_Clenndening_2006, 24027009_Drost_2013) The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs2228007) “With untested allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.011 (1000 Genomes Project), “Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database”, “MMR Gene Unclassified Variants Database”, “InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database”, and ClinVar database as a benign variant.The variant was classified as a benign/likely benign variant by the Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) (submitted within the ClinVar database and derived from Myriad reports) with 6 separate submitters. The variant was classified as “unclassified” by a clinical laboratory within the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (http://opengenetics.ca/). This variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 26 of 2178 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0119), Exome Variant Server project in 270 of 13006 European American/African American alleles (frequency: 0.02), increasing the likelihood that this is/may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The p.Thr511 residue is not conserved in mammals and the variant amino acid Threonine (Thr) is present in Macaques and Trichoplax adhaerens, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity but it increases the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. The c.1531A>G variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) does not predict a difference in splicing in 5 of 5 different programs. (However, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity.) In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant satisfies our laboratory requirements as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.063
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.57
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.57
CADD
Benign
0.32
DANN
Benign
0.17
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.087
T;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.049
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.40
T;T;.;T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0030
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.83
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.76
N;.;.;.;.
PhyloP100
-0.35
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.75
N;N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.031
Sift
Benign
0.76
T;T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.88
T;T;.;.;.
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.017
MPC
0.036
ClinPred
0.0021
T
GERP RS
1.9
Varity_R
0.016
gMVP
0.18
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2228007; hg19: chr7-6026865; COSMIC: COSV104554297; API