Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.1266G>A(p.Glu422Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000608 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).
BP6
Variant 7-5987499-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5987499-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 183779.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-5987499-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-5987499-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.782 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00332 (505/152292) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0114 (472/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0105. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 251 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided
- -
Feb 01, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
Variant summary: The c.1266G>A variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in no amino acid change. One in-silico tool predicts damaging outcome for this variant. This variant is found in 116/120402 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0009634, which is about 8 times of maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0001136), suggesting this variant is benign. Sequence alignment suggests alleles identified in ExAC controls are unlikely from PMS2 pseudogenes. In addition, two clinical laboratories classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. -
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Dec 28, 2022
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Sep 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
PMS2: BP4, BP7, BS1 -
not specified Benign:4
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Jun 23, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Feb 18, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:4
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Jun 05, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Apr 05, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Mar 21, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Sep 22, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Sep 29, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Nov 18, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Jul 02, 2021
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter