Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BA1
The NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.706-4dupT variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]
Variant 7-5997426-G-GA is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5997426-G-GA is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 198429.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=9, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.11 is higher than 0.05.
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. -
Feb 19, 2016
Counsyl
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
May 20, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
May 08, 2015
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Jun 28, 2017
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
not specified Benign:4
-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Apr 07, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Apr 10, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Jul 06, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Oct 06, 2021
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Jul 25, 2017
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Lynch syndrome Benign:2
Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
May 11, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
-
Ding PR Lab, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing
- -
not provided Benign:1
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center