Menu
GeneBe

7-6006003-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.52A>G(p.Ile18Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.011 in 1,610,660 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 132 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I18T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0083 ( 9 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.011 ( 123 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 missense

Scores

6
5
7

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:32O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.91
Variant links:
Genes affected
PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009115964).
BP6
Variant 7-6006003-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-6006003-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 41713.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr7-6006003-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-6006003-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0112 (16400/1458362) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0122 (13562/1111660). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.012. There are 123 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 8035 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 8 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PMS2NM_000535.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.52A>G p.Ile18Val missense_variant 2/15 ENST00000265849.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PMS2ENST00000265849.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.52A>G p.Ile18Val missense_variant 2/151 NM_000535.7 P3P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00831
AC:
1265
AN:
152180
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00171
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0301
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00670
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00901
AC:
2213
AN:
245572
Hom.:
21
AF XY:
0.00917
AC XY:
1229
AN XY:
134082
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00213
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000402
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00306
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0325
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00924
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0112
AC:
16400
AN:
1458362
Hom.:
123
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0111
AC XY:
8035
AN XY:
725510
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00237
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00370
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0324
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0107
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00832
AC:
1267
AN:
152298
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00834
AC XY:
621
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00171
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00439
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0301
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00663
Alfa
AF:
0.00582
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00652
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0124
AC:
46
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0140
AC:
54
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00331
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0113
AC:
52
ExAC
AF:
0.00899
AC:
1048
EpiCase
AF:
0.0104
EpiControl
AF:
0.0105

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:32Other:2
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 19, 2016- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 12, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoSep 13, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 03, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Jul 12, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingVantari GeneticsFeb 03, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 26, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jul 28, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsJan 15, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneKor MSAAug 01, 2018- -
not provided Benign:6Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024PMS2: BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 16, 2017Variant summary: The PMS2 c.52A>G (p.Ile18Val) variant located in the Histidine kinase-like ATPase, C-terminal domain of the protein (via InterPro) involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide and 3/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). However, a functional study indicates the variant does not affect MMR activity (Drost_2013. This variant was found in 2457/271244 control chromosomes (gnomAD) including 22 homozygotes at a frequency of 0.0090519, which is approximately 80 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic PMS2 variant (0.0001136), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. However, this observation needs to be cautiously considered because the sequencing technology (exome and genome sequencing) used cannot rule out the fact that the pseudogene could have been amplified. Several publications have cited the variant in affected individuals with Lynch Syndrome or related disorders, including reports of lack of cosegregation with disease in multiple families (Leongamornlert_2014 and Hendriks_2006). This variant also co-occurred with another pathogenic variant in a CRC patient and a suspected LS patient (Haraldsdottir_2017 and van der Klift_2016). In addition, in multiple internal LCA samples this variant was found to co-occur with another pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants such as PMS2 c.137G>T (p.Ser46Ile), MSH6 c.1634_1637delAAGA (p.Lys545fsX25), BRCA2 c.4647_4650delAGAG (p.Lys1549fsX18) MUTYH c.933+3A>C, MSH2 c.2038C>T (p.Arg680X) and PMS2 c.251-2A>T and MLH1 c.955G>T (p.Glu319X). Furthermore, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases in ClinVar have classified this variant as likely benign/benign. Therefore due to the lack of cosegregation with disease, multiple co-occurrences with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant, and multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classifying the variant as "likely benign/benign," the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJul 29, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 10, 2023- -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Lynch syndrome 4 Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterMay 08, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtFeb 05, 2016- -
Lynch syndrome 1 Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPathway GenomicsOct 17, 2014- -
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelresearchInternational Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)Oct 10, 2014MAF >1% in a specific ethnic group (European American) -
Mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical CenterJun 03, 2019- -
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaDec 22, 2015- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Endometrial carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-PMS2, EXON2, c.52A>G, p.Ile18Val, Heterozygous, Benign The PMS2 p.Ile18Val variant was identified in 11 of 1400 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.008) from individuals or families with colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, or common variable immunodeficiency disorder and was present in 1 of 1552 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0006) from healthy individuals (Clendenning 2006, Hendriks 2006, Van Schouwenburg 2015, van der Klift 2016, Leongamornlert 2014, Bodian 2014). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs63750123) as "With other allele", and ClinVar (classified as benign by fifteen submitters; as likely benign by six submitters). The variant was identified in control databases in 2457 of 271244 chromosomes (22 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.009, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 44 of 22858 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Other in 50 of 6380 chromosomes (freq: 0.008), Latino in 65 of 34296 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), European in 1387 of 122680 chromosomes (freq: 0.01), Ashkenazi Jewish in 5 of 9990 chromosomes (freq: 0.0005), Finnish in 811 of 25762 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), and South Asian in 95 of 30546 chromosomes (freq: 0.003); it was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Ile18 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In addition, the variant demonstrated repair efficiency similar to wild type and repair-proficient controls (Drost 2013). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. Assessment Date: 2019/07/22 References (PMIDs): 16619239, 24027009, 16472587, 26122175, 27435373, 24556621, 24728327 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.29
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.049
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.17
Cadd
Uncertain
25
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.24
T;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.75
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.71
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0091
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.69
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.9
M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.89
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.64
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D
Vest4
0.66
MVP
0.93
MPC
0.25
ClinPred
0.019
T
GERP RS
5.7
Varity_R
0.38
gMVP
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs63750123; hg19: chr7-6045634; COSMIC: COSV56149828; COSMIC: COSV56149828; API