7-74053320-CTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTG-CTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTG
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_000501.4(ELN):c.1096+43_1096+50dupGTGTGTGT variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000501.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cutis laxa, autosomal dominant 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
 - supravalvular aortic stenosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
 - autosomal dominant cutis laxaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
 - familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes   AF:  0.00284  AC: 409AN: 144144Hom.:  0  Cov.: 0 show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF:  0.00189  AC: 2680AN: 1416058Hom.:  0  Cov.: 0 AF XY:  0.00185  AC XY: 1301AN XY: 701830 show subpopulations  ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome   AF:  0.00284  AC: 409AN: 144248Hom.:  0  Cov.: 0 AF XY:  0.00247  AC XY: 173AN XY: 69950 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Supravalvar aortic stenosis    Uncertain:1 
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the effect of this variant on mRNA splicing is currently unknown. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ELN-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change falls in intron 18 of the ELN gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the ELN protein. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at