7-74056389-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000501.4(ELN):c.1269C>T(p.Val423Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000359 in 1,613,340 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V423V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000501.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELN | NM_000501.4 | c.1269C>T | p.Val423Val | synonymous_variant | 20/33 | ENST00000252034.12 | NP_000492.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELN | ENST00000252034.12 | c.1269C>T | p.Val423Val | synonymous_variant | 20/33 | 1 | NM_000501.4 | ENSP00000252034.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00184 AC: 280AN: 151926Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000469 AC: 118AN: 251480Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000361 AC XY: 49AN XY: 135914
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000205 AC: 299AN: 1461296Hom.: 1 Cov.: 70 AF XY: 0.000175 AC XY: 127AN XY: 726944
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00184 AC: 280AN: 152044Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00182 AC XY: 135AN XY: 74336
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 30, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2023 | ELN: BP4, BP7 - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 04, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 02, 2015 | - - |
Supravalvar aortic stenosis Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cutis laxa, autosomal dominant 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at