7-74194806-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_022170.2(EIF4H):c.535C>G(p.Pro179Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000221 in 1,605,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P179S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022170.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022170.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIF4H | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.535C>G | p.Pro179Ala | missense | Exon 6 of 7 | ENSP00000265753.8 | Q15056-1 | ||
| EIF4H | TSL:1 | c.475C>G | p.Pro159Ala | missense | Exon 5 of 6 | ENSP00000265754.8 | Q15056-2 | ||
| EIF4H | c.526C>G | p.Pro176Ala | missense | Exon 6 of 7 | ENSP00000504041.1 | A0A7I2V4E4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000926 AC: 23AN: 248374 AF XY: 0.0000966 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000232 AC: 337AN: 1453480Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000244 AC XY: 176AN XY: 721054 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152364Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74498 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at