7-80462526-C-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_001102386.3(GNAT3):c.696G>T(p.Met232Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000867 in 1,613,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M232T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001102386.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- platelet-type bleeding disorder 10Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001102386.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNAT3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.696G>T | p.Met232Ile | missense | Exon 6 of 8 | ENSP00000381339.3 | A8MTJ3 | ||
| CD36 | TSL:2 | c.-477-23941C>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000399421.1 | P16671-1 | |||
| CD36 | c.-477-23941C>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000626973.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000559 AC: 85AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000482 AC: 120AN: 248898 AF XY: 0.000444 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000899 AC: 1314AN: 1461242Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000865 AC XY: 629AN XY: 726892 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000559 AC: 85AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000525 AC XY: 39AN XY: 74340 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at