7-80646139-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001001548.3(CD36):c.-132A>G variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000197 in 151,952 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001001548.3 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- platelet-type bleeding disorder 10Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001001548.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD36 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.-132A>G | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 15 | ENSP00000415743.2 | P16671-1 | |||
| CD36 | TSL:1 | c.-132A>G | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 14 | ENSP00000308165.7 | P16671-1 | |||
| CD36 | TSL:1 | c.-132A>G | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 14 | ENSP00000378268.3 | P16671-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 151952Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1876Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 1014
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 151952Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000270 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74182 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at