7-91973742-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_005751.5(AKAP9):​c.80C>T​(p.Ser27Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00274 in 1,613,500 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S27W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

AKAP9
NM_005751.5 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.848

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
AKAP9 (HGNC:379): (A-kinase anchoring protein 9) The A-kinase anchor proteins (AKAPs) are a group of structurally diverse proteins which have the common function of binding to the regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (PKA) and confining the holoenzyme to discrete locations within the cell. This gene encodes a member of the AKAP family. Alternate splicing of this gene results in at least two isoforms that localize to the centrosome and the Golgi apparatus, and interact with numerous signaling proteins from multiple signal transduction pathways. These signaling proteins include type II protein kinase A, serine/threonine kinase protein kinase N, protein phosphatase 1, protein phosphatase 2a, protein kinase C-epsilon and phosphodiesterase 4D3. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]
AKAP9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • male infertility with azoospermia or oligozoospermia due to single gene mutation
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
  • long QT syndrome 11
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • long QT syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0089434385).
BP6
Variant 7-91973742-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-91973742-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136346.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AKAP9NM_005751.5 linkc.80C>T p.Ser27Leu missense_variant Exon 2 of 50 ENST00000356239.8 NP_005742.4 Q99996-2Q6PJH3Q5GIA7
AKAP9NM_147185.3 linkc.80C>T p.Ser27Leu missense_variant Exon 2 of 50 NP_671714.1 Q99996-3Q6PJH3Q5GIA7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AKAP9ENST00000356239.8 linkc.80C>T p.Ser27Leu missense_variant Exon 2 of 50 1 NM_005751.5 ENSP00000348573.3 Q99996-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00202
AC:
307
AN:
151608
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00260
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00168
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000855
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00297
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00336
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00173
AC:
433
AN:
249848
AF XY:
0.00180
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000835
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000839
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00279
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000545
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000554
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00270
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00181
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00281
AC:
4107
AN:
1461774
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00282
AC XY:
2053
AN XY:
727176
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000926
AC:
31
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000917
AC:
41
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00253
AC:
66
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39682
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00157
AC:
135
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000749
AC:
40
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00711
AC:
41
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00328
AC:
3646
AN:
1111950
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00174
AC:
105
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.465
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
218
437
655
874
1092
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
140
280
420
560
700
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00202
AC:
307
AN:
151726
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00179
AC XY:
133
AN XY:
74114
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
43
AN:
41354
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
29
AN:
15234
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00168
AC:
8
AN:
4768
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000855
AC:
9
AN:
10522
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00297
AC:
202
AN:
67908
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00332
AC:
7
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18
36
54
72
90
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00237
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00198
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00378
AC:
14
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00363
AC:
14
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00159
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00244
AC:
21
ExAC
AF:
0.00163
AC:
198
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00376
EpiControl
AF:
0.00308

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Long QT syndrome 11 Benign:5
Sep 21, 2016
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 18, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 14, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 30, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
Feb 15, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 20, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: AKAP9 c.80C>T (p.Ser27Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0017 in 249848 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 173 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in AKAP9 causing Arrhythmia phenotype (1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Jun 24, 2013
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Jan 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

AKAP9: BS1, BS2 -

-
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Aug 06, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.089
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.46
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.37
.;.;T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.31
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.42
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.13
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T;D;T;T;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.043
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0089
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
PhyloP100
0.85
PrimateAI
Benign
0.37
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.2
N;.;D;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.024
Sift
Uncertain
0.020
D;.;T;.;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.039
.;D;T;D;.
Polyphen
0.47
.;.;P;.;.
Vest4
0.24
MVP
0.57
MPC
0.050
ClinPred
0.013
T
GERP RS
1.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.054
gMVP
0.078
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142401936; hg19: chr7-91603056; API