7-92001218-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_005751.5(AKAP9):c.1301G>A(p.Arg434Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00215 in 1,613,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 57 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 35 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 22 hom. )
Consequence
AKAP9
NM_005751.5 missense
NM_005751.5 missense
Scores
3
14
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.91
Genes affected
AKAP9 (HGNC:379): (A-kinase anchoring protein 9) The A-kinase anchor proteins (AKAPs) are a group of structurally diverse proteins which have the common function of binding to the regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (PKA) and confining the holoenzyme to discrete locations within the cell. This gene encodes a member of the AKAP family. Alternate splicing of this gene results in at least two isoforms that localize to the centrosome and the Golgi apparatus, and interact with numerous signaling proteins from multiple signal transduction pathways. These signaling proteins include type II protein kinase A, serine/threonine kinase protein kinase N, protein phosphatase 1, protein phosphatase 2a, protein kinase C-epsilon and phosphodiesterase 4D3. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0029833019).
BP6
Variant 7-92001218-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-92001218-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 191550.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-92001218-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0116 (1758/152164) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0399 (1656/41524). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0383. There are 35 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 860 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1758 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKAP9 | NM_005751.5 | c.1301G>A | p.Arg434Gln | missense_variant | 8/50 | ENST00000356239.8 | NP_005742.4 | |
AKAP9 | NM_147185.3 | c.1301G>A | p.Arg434Gln | missense_variant | 8/50 | NP_671714.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKAP9 | ENST00000356239.8 | c.1301G>A | p.Arg434Gln | missense_variant | 8/50 | 1 | NM_005751.5 | ENSP00000348573 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0116 AC: 1757AN: 152046Hom.: 35 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1757
AN:
152046
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00284 AC: 711AN: 250028Hom.: 15 AF XY: 0.00230 AC XY: 311AN XY: 135258
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
711
AN:
250028
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
311
AN XY:
135258
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00117 AC: 1711AN: 1461724Hom.: 22 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 734AN XY: 727146
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1711
AN:
1461724
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
734
AN XY:
727146
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0116 AC: 1758AN: 152164Hom.: 35 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0116 AC XY: 860AN XY: 74394
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1758
AN:
152164
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
860
AN XY:
74394
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
130
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
AC:
433
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 02, 2019 | Variant summary: AKAP9 c.1301G>A (p.Arg434Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the ELK domain (IPR005539) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0028 in 250028 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.039 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 14 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is well above the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in AKAP9 causing Arrhythmia phenotype (1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1301G>A in individuals affected with Arrhythmia and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Three submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign (2x) /likely benign (1x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Long QT syndrome 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Dec 05, 2021 | - - |
Congenital long QT syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 26, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.;.;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;.;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
.;T;T;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at