7-92501975-G-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000466.3(PEX1):c.2331C>A(p.Gly777Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.919 in 1,613,548 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 681,914 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.93 ( 65997 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.92 ( 615917 hom. )
Consequence
PEX1
NM_000466.3 synonymous
NM_000466.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.52
Genes affected
PEX1 (HGNC:8850): (peroxisomal biogenesis factor 1) This gene encodes a member of the AAA ATPase family, a large group of ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities. This protein is cytoplasmic but is often anchored to a peroxisomal membrane where it forms a heteromeric complex and plays a role in the import of proteins into peroxisomes and peroxisome biogenesis. Mutations in this gene have been associated with complementation group 1 peroxisomal disorders such as neonatal adrenoleukodystrophy, infantile Refsum disease, and Zellweger syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
BP6
Variant 7-92501975-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-92501975-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93105.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-92501975-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-92501975-G-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.52 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.968 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX1 | NM_000466.3 | c.2331C>A | p.Gly777Gly | synonymous_variant | 14/24 | ENST00000248633.9 | NP_000457.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX1 | ENST00000248633.9 | c.2331C>A | p.Gly777Gly | synonymous_variant | 14/24 | 1 | NM_000466.3 | ENSP00000248633.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.930 AC: 141562AN: 152186Hom.: 65939 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
141562
AN:
152186
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.921 AC: 231601AN: 251340Hom.: 106854 AF XY: 0.920 AC XY: 124972AN XY: 135840
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
231601
AN:
251340
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
124972
AN XY:
135840
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.918 AC: 1341151AN: 1461244Hom.: 615917 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.918 AC XY: 667282AN XY: 726982
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1341151
AN:
1461244
Hom.:
Cov.:
42
AF XY:
AC XY:
667282
AN XY:
726982
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.930 AC: 141681AN: 152304Hom.: 65997 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.929 AC XY: 69202AN XY: 74458
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
141681
AN:
152304
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
69202
AN XY:
74458
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3279
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 29, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: 92% of total chromosomes in ExAC - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 13, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Zellweger spectrum disorders Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Mar 29, 2017 | - - |
Peroxisome biogenesis disorder 1A (Zellweger) Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Heimler syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Peroxisome biogenesis disorder 1B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at